It is possible for you, as a PhD candidate in geography or other related fields to write a doctoral thesis on river catchment areas. There are 7 key steps you need to follow, while writing this sort of doctoral thesis:
- Go through the available literature on the subject (to see what other researchers have written on the subject)
- Identify the specific issue (related to river catchment areas) you need to focus on in your thesis
- Create the thesis topics/themes
- Undertake the actual research, in the river catchment areas, to generate content for the thesis
- Compile the actual thesis
- Proofread the thesis and edit it as necessary
- Submit the thesis to the department you wish to earn a doctorate from
- Defend the thesis during the oral presentation session
To be sure, these steps are likely to take a lot of time. You need to allocate enough time to the doctoral thesis writing project. You are likely to end up being ‘too busy’ during the period when you will be writing the thesis. You may be so busy that you are unable to respond to the getmycreditcardoffer — in spite of having received the offer in your mailbox. So that is where, even after getting the capital one credit card offer in the mail, you are unable to actually apply for the card, because you are too busy writing the thesis.
Of course, there is the option of hiring research assistant to help you with some aspects of the thesis writing process. Yet some tasks in the process can only be undertaken by the researcher whose name will appear on the thesis. In a nutshell, it is very hard to get a PhD without breaking a sweat, especially with regard to the thesis writing bit
When all is said and done, you’d experience great joy and satisfaction on the day when you finally graduate with a PhD, on account of the thesis you wrote about river catchment areas.
One of the questions that conservationists grapple with is the one touching on the fate of the structures that are built on river catchment areas. The key question is on whether such buildings should be allowed to continue standing, or whether they should be demolished.
If the buildings on river catchment areas are demolished, it would serve as a deterrent to other individuals who may have aspirations of building on such areas. The individuals would think twice before going ahead to put up structures on river catchment areas: knowing that there is a risk of the buildings being brought down. Some people argue that this is actually the best way to go about conserving the river catchment areas.
Yet, on the other hand, the decision to demolish the structures that are built on river catchment areas is bound to have a negative political impact. The owners of the buildings are likely to revolt: and these are usually well-connected individuals. They are the sorts of individuals who can actually bring a government down.
Ideally, a government should do what is right, even if it is not necessarily popular. Yet governments care about their popularity a great deal. From time to time, we see surveys (much similar to the dgcustomerfirst survey) aimed at gauging governments’ popularity. That is where, every once in a while, you come across media reports that such and such a president’s approval ratings are at such and such percentage points. This means that the governments can’t afford to totally ignore people’s opinions. And seeing that demolition of structures that are built on river catchment areas is bound to make any government unpopular, that is how some governments opt to allow such buildings to continue standing. But by so doing, they end up endangering the rivers that flow from the catchment areas — which has a rather negative impact on more people downstream.
It therefore becomes clear that in making the decision on whether the structures built on river catchment areas should be demolished, governments have to engage in delicate balancing acts.